NW Native Art • The Southern Shelf • Reading 2 of 8
Before the blanket and before the carving, the first canvas was the person. What heads, lips, and skin recorded, and what archaeology can and cannot read back.
A note before we begin. This week’s evidence comes largely from the ancestors themselves. It comes from burials studied by archaeologists, and from observations written down by outsiders. Both kinds of source demand care. The best current work is done in partnership with the descendant communities, and where the record touches painful things, including slavery, we will name them plainly and move with respect. [CO-AUTHOR: any adjustment to how this ground is walked.]
For roughly the last two thousand years around the Salish Sea, most free-born Coast Salish people carried a mark they received before they could walk, a gently sloped forehead shaped in infancy on the cradleboard with soft pads and bindings while the skull’s plates were still growing (Pitt Rivers Museum, n.d.; Rorabaugh & Shantry, 2017). The current scholarly term is cranial modification or shaping. Older writing says “head flattening” or “deformation,” words worth retiring except when quoting the old titles.
Understand what the practice was and was not. It was not injury, and it did not affect health or mind. It was a permanent, visible statement of belonging made by a family in a baby’s first weeks, and precisely because it could only be done in infancy, it could only ever record the status a person was born to (Rorabaugh, 2024). An adult could not acquire it, fake it, or lose it. Archaeologists therefore read its spread across the Salish Sea as the signature of hereditary standing becoming entrenched, a society writing rank onto bodies (Rorabaugh, 2024).
And here the record turns hard. The ethnohistoric and archaeological reading is that children born into slavery were not shaped, so an unmodified head could mark servile status for life [VERIFY: standard claim, attributed to Ames & Maschner 1999, page unconfirmed]. Slavery was real on this coast, in the South as in the North, and Week 3 returns to it. A course about art does not get to skip it, because the art itself, the visible body, was partly about exactly this.
One more caution, about pictures. The most famous image of the practice, Paul Kane’s oil painting of a Cowlitz mother and child, is a studio composite assembled from sketches of different people from different nations, painted for Victorian buyers (Gehmacher, n.d.). It gets reprinted as ethnography. It is not. It is an early example of something this course will keep flagging, the outsider image that outlives the truth.
Before shaped heads became the mark of standing, there was the labret, an ornament of stone or bone worn through a pierced hole below the lip. Labrets appear on this coast around five thousand years ago, centuries before the durable signs of hereditary inequality (La Salle, 2014; Rorabaugh, 2024). A labret differs from a shaped head in one crucial way. An adult can choose it. It is worked for, adopted, achieved. Around the Salish Sea, over roughly two thousand years, the record shows labrets fading while cranial shaping rises (Rorabaugh, 2024). Many archaeologists read that as a society shifting how it marked status, from something a person could earn toward something a person was born with. Others complicate the story. Rorabaugh and Shantry (2017) argue the shift is better read as escalating displays of commitment, each costlier and harder to reverse than the last, and the older claim that labrets belonged mainly to women has been directly challenged. In the Salish Sea they appear to have been worn by both sexes, and their meanings were probably plural and local (La Salle, 2014). Archaeology, done honestly, reports its arguments as arguments.
Here is the local hook, and it is very local. One of the studies underlying this section analyzes material from Xwe'chi'eXen [ORTHO], Cherry Point, the ancestral Lummi village site on the shore north of Bellingham that the Lummi Nation has fought in recent years to protect. The study’s authors say in their own acknowledgments that the site is what motivated the work (Rorabaugh, 2024). The ancestors in these datasets are not abstractions. For many readers of this page, some of them are family.
Coast Salish people also tattooed. The old ethnographies record tattooing among Salish peoples, most commonly on women, wrist and ankle and sometimes face, applied by expert older women using soot and a needle [VERIFY: Coast Salish passages in Barnett 1955, Elmendorf 1960, Gunther 1927 need page verification]. The two regional techniques were skin stitching, drawing a pigmented thread beneath the skin, and hand poke, dot by dot (Krutak, 2008). The richest published tattoo ethnography from Salish country, though, is Interior Salish, James Teit’s 1930 study of the Nlaka'pamux, who are relatives inland, not Coast Salish (Teit, 1930). That distinction matters, and noticing it is part of learning to read sources.
Canada outlawed cultural tattooing in 1885, in the same legislative breath as the potlatch ban (University of Victoria Legacy Art Galleries, 2022). The contemporary revival of Indigenous tattooing in the Northwest is real and growing, led by practitioners like Dion Kaszas, who is Nlaka'pamux, and the Earthline Tattoo Collective (CBC News, 2017). A specifically Coast Salish revival is quieter in the published record so far. Treat that as a documentation gap, not an absence, and [CO-AUTHOR: any practitioners or community practice appropriate to name here].
Ears and noses carried wealth too. Early observers describe abalone pendants at the ear and nose, and dentalium, the small white tusk shell, plaited into headbands and necklaces (Keddie, 2025). Dentalium is worth a pause because it teaches trade. The shells were harvested in deep water off western Vancouver Island, mainly by Nuu-chah-nulth specialists with a remarkable broom-like spear, and traded as currency from Alaska to California (Keddie, 2025). Every dentalium ornament in a Salish burial is imported wealth, a record of relationships stretching over the horizon. The body was not just a canvas. It was a ledger.
One more form of worn status waits at the edge of this week, the woven robe. A mountain goat and woolly dog blanket on the shoulders was wealth, protection, and standing, all at once, and it gets its own week later in the course (Tepper, George & Joseph, 2017). For now, just connect the thread. The same society that shaped heads in the cradle and pierced lips for labrets also wrapped its people in textiles that said who they were. None of this was decoration. All of it was record.
Here is the through-line this week. On the Salish Sea, identity was worn, and much of it was assigned before a person could speak. When the course reaches Week 7 and asks why some knowledge is guarded, remember that this coast has always understood information about persons, who they are, what they carry, what they are entitled to, as a serious and consequential thing.
Looking ahead: Next week, the waters between. Raids from the north, forts above the beaches, the sling nobody expects, and a battle won by an alliance with no chief in charge.
For key terms and reflection questions, see this week’s Weekly Guide.
CBC News. (2017, July 30). Sticking to tradition: Indigenous tattoo revival. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/sticking-to-tradition-indigenous-tattoo-revival-1.4227212
Gehmacher, A. (n.d.). Portrait of controversy: Paul Kane’s Flat Head Woman and Child, Caw-wacham. Art Canada Institute. https://www.aci-iac.ca/spotlight/portrait-of-controversy-by-arlene-gehmacher/
Keddie, G. (2025). Dentalium spears and models. https://grantkeddie.com/2025/07/dentalium-spears-and-models/
Krutak, L. (2008). Many stitches for life: The antiquity of thread and needle tattooing. https://larskrutak.com/many-stitches-for-life-the-antiquity-of-thread-and-needle-tattooing/
La Salle, M. (2014). Labrets and their social context on coastal British Columbia. BC Studies, 180, 123–153. https://doi.org/10.14288/bcs.v0i180.183947
Pitt Rivers Museum. (n.d.). Head shaping: Flattening (Body Arts). University of Oxford. https://web.prm.ox.ac.uk/bodyarts/index.php/permanent-body-arts/reshaping-and-piercing/163-head-shaping-flattening.html
Rorabaugh, A. N. (2024). A social network analysis of traditional labrets and horizontal relationships in the Salish Sea region of northwestern North America. American Antiquity, 89(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2023.98
Rorabaugh, A. N., & Shantry, K. (2017). From labrets to cranial modification: Credibility enhancing displays and the changing expression of Coast Salish resource commitments. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 12(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2016.1203835
Teit, J. A. (1930). Tattooing and face and body painting of the Thompson Indians, British Columbia. In 45th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology (pp. 397–439). U.S. Government Printing Office.
Tepper, L. H., George, J. (Chepximiya Siyam), & Joseph, W. (2017). Salish blankets: Robes of protection and transformation, symbols of wealth. University of Nebraska Press. [AMAZON LINK]
University of Victoria Legacy Art Galleries. (2022, January 12). Reawakening cultural tattooing of the Northwest. https://www.uvic.ca/news/archive/topics/2022+body-language-legacy-exhibit+news